Court Punishment: Jail

A DUI / DWI lawyer will often work to get the charges and the punishment against a client reduced as much as possible. If the charge is felony drunk driving an attorney will commonly ask for a reduced charge of misdemeanor DUI / DWI. When the charge is misdemeanor driving under the influence, a lawyer will attempt to negotiate for lesser charges such a wet-reckless or a dry-reckless. In many cases, the nature of the charge will reflect directly upon the sentence. Whenever there is a jail sentence, the time of the sentence may be lessened if the charges can be reduced.

A person who is convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs or driving while intoxicated may quite possibly face a jail sentence. The jail sentence will depend on various factors including the abilities and tenacity of the DUI / DWI lawyer. Prior convictions are often major considerations in determining the length of a prison sentence.

The harshest penalties are reserved for felony DUIs. Felony drunk driving cases include four time offenders and drinking and driving involving injuries to others. On a first offense involving an injury, the jail sentence will be five days to one year in jail if the driver accepts probation. If the driver chooses to decline probation, he or she will face between 90 days and one year in jail. A second driving under the influence offense within the 10 year “lookback” period will result in either a 30 day in jail term or 120 days to one year in jail. If the driver declines probation the 30 day sentence will not be available.

A first time offender won’t likely serve jail time for a simple misdemeanor. The typical first offense will carry no minimum jail sentence. Although there is no minimum, the judge may sentence the driver to 48 hours to six months in jail. An experienced California DUI / DWI attorney can generally help a first time drunk driving offender avoid jail time if there are no special or extraordinary circumstances. This rule applies when a driver agrees to go on probation. If a driver seeks to avoid probation they will face a sentence of 96 hours to six months in jail.

Second time drunk drivers within the 10 year “lookback” period who are willing to accept the conditions of probation can face a 96 hour sentence, a 10 day sentence, or up to year in jail. When the second time offender rejects probation he or she will face 90 days to one year in jail. When a third time offender accepts probation they will face 120 days to one year in jail. When the third time offender rejects the offer of probation they too will face a sentence between 120 days and one year in jail.

At the end of the day, the quality of one’s criminal defense attorney can greatly affect a prison sentence. Judges have discretion to sentence a person to the minimum or maximum sentence, or something in between. Oftentimes it is the lawyer that convinces the judge to be lenient in sentencing.

Drivers arrested on suspicion of DUI in California are either released on their own recognizance, also known as OR, or must post bail in order to get out of jail. Bail in drunk driving cases is set just as in any other criminal case. Most counties have a bail schedule that outlines the bail requirements for each offense.

Many jurisdictions will release most driving under the influence suspects on their own recognizance, which means the driver won’t have to post bail. However, even if the driver is released on OR, DUI suspects typically must remain in jail for a certain number of hours, until police are certain that the driver is sober. This is designed to protect the arresting agency from liability – if an accused drunk driver was involved in an injury accident after being released from custody, the arresting agency may be held responsible.

While many jurisdictions release drunk driving suspects on their own recognizance, others require bail to be posted, even for misdemeanor offenses. Accused motorists who refused to submit to a chemical test, who had a blood or breath alcohol level (BAC) of .20 percent or greater, or who were involved in an accident are likely to be required to post bail.

Felony DUI cases always require bail to secure the driver’s release. Bail in a felony DUI arrest will typically be $100,000 or more. Bail bond firms typically require a down payment of 10 percent of the bail amount in order to secure a driver’s release.

The legal ramifications of a California drunk driving arrest are extremely severe, and a skilled attorney can help to arrange bail and protect the driver’s rights. The experienced attorneys of the Kavinoky Law Firm will help to secure the accused driver’s release and craft a defense strategy designed to minimize or even eliminate the consequences of a drunk driving arrest.

Evidential breath tests, also known as EBTs, are breath-testing instruments commonly used in California drunk driving investigations. Police and prosecutors rely heavily on EBT results, but they are far from foolproof. A skilled DUI / DWI defense attorney from The Kavinoky Law Firm will use a proven strategy to effectively challenge the results of EBTs.

To see how EBTs can be successfully challenged, it’s helpful to understand how alcohol enters a person’s breath. When an individual takes a drink, the alcohol isn’t digested like other substances – it gets absorbed by the stomach and small intestine. From this point, the alcohol enters the bloodstream.

The alcohol is then distributed by the blood to all tissues and organs that contain water. Veins carry the blood to and through the lungs, where the blood becomes oxygenated. The lungs are made up of air pockets, which are surrounded by blood-rich membranes, thus exposing the lung tissue to the consumed alcohol.

Third, the alcohol is eliminated by the body in the breath by evaporation. Evaporation occurs because the alcohol circulating in the blood comes in contact with the blood-rich membranes in the lung tissue and evaporates. During exhalation, the air is forced out of the lungs and emerges into the breath.

Infrared breath testing instruments identify ethyl alcohol molecules based on the way they absorb infrared light. No other compound absorbs radiation at the exact same wavelengths. In this sense, ethyl alcohol has a distinctive fingerprint.

EBTs measure the amount of alcohol in the breath by a partition ratio and converts it to an estimation of blood alcohol content. The problem with EBTs is that they generally contain instruments that detect the presence of mouth alcohol, commonly referred to as “slope detectors.” Mouth alcohol is the undetected, raw, unabsorbed alcohol in the mouth that falsely elevates the results of the breath test. The sources of mouth alcohol may include:

• A substance ingested prior to the breath test, like mouthwash, breath strips, cough drops or syrups, or asthma inhalers
• A substance regurgitated or burped from the stomach
• A case of gastroesophageal reflux, also known as GERD
• Dental work, such as dentures, braces or bridges which trap alcohol
• Mouth jewelry, such as tongue piercings, which trap alcohol
• Food in the teeth, especially bread and products containing yeast
• Tobacco products

The EBT slope detector reflects a real-time reading of the breath sample. Mouth alcohol creates a different pattern than a normal breath sample. If a subject has no mouth alcohol, the EBT device will read a continuous, though not linear, rise in breath alcohol until it reaches a plateau. If mouth alcohol is present, there may be a significant and sudden drop. A slope detector identifies and reports this drop as mouth alcohol, thus invalidating the result.

Another problem with EBTs is that police don’t always follow the proper waiting period before starting the test. Mouth alcohol evaporates after a 15-minute period, as long as no additional alcohol is introduced. Thus, police agencies are mandated to continuously observe the subject for 15 minutes before giving the breath test. This observation period cuts down on the possibility of a contaminated sample producing a falsely high BAC result.

Another issue with EBTs is California’s implied consent statute. According to the California Vehicle Code, a person who drives a motor vehicle is deemed to have given his or her consent to chemical testing of his or her blood or breath for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his or her blood, if lawfully arrested for an offense committed in violation of Section 23140 (DUI for those under 21 years of age) or 23152 (DUI) or 23153 (DUI with injury). That means that a driver is only required to consent to a chemical test if arrested. However, police often administer breath tests prior to making an arrest.

Generally, a person has the choice of either a blood or breath test. However, if drugs are suspected the person may have to submit to a blood or urine test. But if only one type of test is available, then the person must submit to the available test. For example, if the person in transported to the hospital, they may have to undergo the blood test because no breath testing machines are present at that location.

Further, according to the California Vehicle Code, the person must be told that failing to submit to a chemical test will result in a fine, suspension or revocation of driving privileges, and mandatory imprisonment.

Finally, if only a breath test is chosen, the driver must be given the choice of having a blood test done in order to retain a sample for independent testing later on, because the breath test does not retain a sample.

Because of the many variables present in EBTs and the regulations governing their use, it is possible to challenge test results in a drunk driving case. Any driver who took a breath test and is facing charges of drinking and driving should consult with a qualified California attorney who specializes in DUI / DWI defense.

Drivers suspected of DUI / DWI in California often must perform field sobriety tests before being arrested. However, no matter how well the driver does on the tests, a drunk driving arrest is practically inevitable. The test is used solely to establish probable cause and create evidence for a court case. However, a skilled DUI / DWI lawyer from The Kavinoky Law Firm can successfully challenge field sobriety tests.

The Walk-and-Turn Test is one of three field sobriety tests standardized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Like other field sobriety exercises, the Walk-and-Turn Test is a divided-attention test – it’s designed to detect both mental and physical impairment by forcing the driver to focus on two tasks simultaneously. A prosecutor will use the test results as circumstantial evidence that the driver was impaired by alcohol or drugs.

The Walk-and-Turn Test is administered in two parts. The driver must first stand heel-to-toe with arms down while listening to the instructions. The officer tells the driver to take nine heel-to-toe steps along a real or imaginary line, turn, and return toward the officer in the same way. During the test, the officer will note any signs of impairment displayed by the driver.

The signs of intoxication the officer looks for include an inability to maintain balance during the test instructions, starting the test too soon, pausing while walking, an inability to touch heel to toe, veering off of the line, using the arms to balance, losing balance during the turn or inability to turn correctly, and miscounting the number of steps. If the officer spots two or more of these signs, he or she will assume that the driver has a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .10 percent or greater, and an arrest for DUI / DWI will follow.

However, many of the so-called signs of intoxication watched for in the Walk-and-Turn Test can be caused by physical conditions unrelated to alcohol, such as illness or injury. Alcohol consumption causes both mental and physical impairment, but mental impairment always occurs first. Physical impairment can be disguised by those with a high tolerance for alcohol, but mental impairment cannot be hidden. Therefore, if the driver shows only physical difficulties but no mental impairment, the field sobriety test results can be successfully challenged.

This test is particularly challenging for drivers with back or leg injuries, individuals older than 65, overweight drivers, and people with inner-ear disorders. A driver who performs the test on uneven ground, or who is wearing high heels, also isn’t likely to perform well.

Sometimes the officer doesn’t even conduct the Walk-and-Turn Test properly, or doesn’t correctly interpret the results. A California criminal defense attorney with a proven track record of winning driving under the influence cases can determine whether factors other than alcohol impairment hindered the driver’s test performance, and challenge the results.

California’s driving under the influence of marijuana cases are basically investigated and prosecuted like any other driving under the influence cases in this state. Once an officer detains a suspect, he or she focuses on several types of circumstantial evidence that he or she uses to arrest or release the driver. Although there are some differences between a “drunk driving” investigation and a DUI investigation that involves drugs, the similarities are substantial and include an observation about the driver’s driving pattern, his or her physical signs and symptoms and his or her performance on the field sobriety tests. Because of the ways in which these types of cases are routinely prosecuted, an individual accused of driving under the influence of marijuana needs an attorney who knows what to expect so that he or she can anticipate the appropriate defenses that will most likely result in a favorable outcome for the accused.

Testimony about the accused individual’s driving pattern is often one of the first types of evidence that the judge and jury will hear. The prosecutor typically has the arresting officer testify about all of the ways that he or she believed that the driver drove improperly or unsafely due to his or her drug impairment. With respect to impairment, it should be noted that one will be declared “under the influence” of marijuana if, as a result of the drug, the driver’s nervous system, brain or muscles were impaired (to an appreciable degree) in that he or she no longer had the ability to drive a car in the manner that an ordinarily prudent and cautious person, in full possession of his or her faculties and using reasonable care, would have under similar circumstances.

Physical signs and symptoms of impairment are also heavily relied on by the arresting officer and prosecutor. The officer will testify that the driver displayed “the signs and symptoms that are characteristic of an impaired person”. An example of these, as they pertain to marijuana use, may include red eyes, a foul odor emanating from the driver’s breath, limited attention span and poor physical coordination.

Field sobriety test or “FST” performance is usually what the arresting officer ultimately bases his or her opinion on when he or she determines that the driver is guilty of driving under the influence. It is also the point during the trial where the prosecutor has the arresting officer spend the most time trying to convince the judge and jury that the defendant is guilty of the charged offense. An experienced D.U.I. criminal attorney expects that the arresting officer will go into detail about each and every thing that the accused did wrong while performing these tests and will commonly rebut the evidence by asking the officer to also detail everything that the driver did correctly.

Chemical tests are one of the main differences between an alcohol-related DUI and a marijuana-related DUI. When arrested for “drunk driving” in California, the accused has a choice between taking a blood or breath test. When arrested for DUID (driving under the influence of drugs), the accused has a choice between a blood or urine test. If the test comes back positive for marijuana use, the prosecutor will be sure to tell the judge and jury that the presence of marijuana confirmed the officer’s opinion that the driver was impaired at the time of driving. A skilled defense lawyer knows that this is an incorrect statement and will ensure that the judge and jury understand that a test indicating use is not the same as a test indicating impairment.

The outstanding attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm know the most convincing arguments to challenge this type of evidence and have successfully defended countless clients against this charge. To learn more, contact one of their exceptionally qualified attorneys today for a free case evaluation.

Alcohol Education Programs in Kern County, California

In California, there are several levels of Alcohol Education Programs that are offered. In order to enroll in one of the programs, one must be referred, either by the court or the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).

BEWARE: Completing an alcohol program may not satisfy the DMV. That is just one reason why it is critical that you consult with a California criminal defense lawyer that concentrates on DUI defense.

Driving Under the Influence programs in Kern County, California:

S.T.E.P.S.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
3533 Mount Vernon Avenue,
Bakersfield, California 93306
Phone: 661-871-3353

Traffic and Alcohol Awareness School of Kern, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
324 Oak Street,
Suite A,
Bakersfield, California 93304
Phone: 661-832-3283; Fax: 661-322-7906

Traffic and Alcohol Awareness School of Kern, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
525 Bear Mountain Boulevard,
Arvin, California 93203
Phone: 661-832-3283; Fax: 661-322-7906

Traffic and Alcohol Awareness School of Kern, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
623 Main Street,
Delano, California 93215
Phone: 661-322-8862

Traffic and Alcohol Awareness School of Kern, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
511 Central Valley Hwy.,
Shafter, California 93263
Phone: 661-832-3283; Fax: 661-322-7906

Traffic and Alcohol Awareness School of Kern, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
210 East Center Street,
Taft College Westec, Taft, California 93268
Phone: 661-832-3283; Fax: 661-322-7906

Traffic and Alcohol Awareness School of Kern, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
443 West Church Street,
Ridgecrest, California 93555
Phone: 760-371-9412; Fax: 760-384-4969

Traffic and Alcohol Awareness School of Kern, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
15666 K Street,
Mojave, California 93501
Phone: 760-371-9412; Fax: 760-384-4969

» Return to Driving Under the Influence program in California, directory of service providers

Note: This list is provided for convenience and informational purposes only. We do not recommend or endorse any specific Alcohol or Drug Risk Reduction Program.

Alcohol Education Programs in Plumas County, California

In California, there are several levels of Alcohol Education Programs that are offered. In order to enroll in one of the programs, one must be referred, either by the court or the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).

BEWARE: Completing an alcohol program may not satisfy the DMV. That is just one reason why it is critical that you consult with a California criminal defense lawyer that concentrates on DUI defense.

Driving Under the Influence programs in Plumas County, California:

Plumas County DDP
(Service Provided: Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
711 East Main Street,
Quincy, California 95971
Phone: 530-283-6316; Fax: 530-283-4420

» Return to Driving Under the Influence program in California, directory of service providers

Note: This list is provided for convenience and informational purposes only. We do not recommend or endorse any specific Alcohol or Drug Risk Reduction Program.

Alcohol Education Programs in Solano County, California

In California, there are several levels of Alcohol Education Programs that are offered. In order to enroll in one of the programs, one must be referred, either by the court or the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).

BEWARE: Completing an alcohol program may not satisfy the DMV. That is just one reason why it is critical that you consult with a California criminal defense lawyer that concentrates on DUI defense.

Driving Under the Influence programs in Solano County, California:

A. K. Bean, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
623 Great Jones Street,
Fairfield, California 94533
Phone: 707-429-8888; Fax: 707-429-1809

A. K. Bean, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
2100 Sacramento Street,
Vallejo, California 94590
Phone: 707-642-8947; Fax: 707-642-8949

A. K. Bean, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
3000 Alamo Street,
Suite 209,
Vacaville, California 95687
Phone: 707-451-9703; Fax: 707-446-0471

Healthy Partnerships, Inc.
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
1286 Callen Street,
Vacaville, California 95688
Phone: 707-447-8982; Fax: 707-447-3205

Healthy Partnerships
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
1735 Enterprise Drive,
Building 1, Suite 105-A,
Fairfield, California 94533
Phone: 707-425-1799; Fax: 707-425-1081

Ia’Tik Recovery Center
(Service Provided: First Offender, 18 Month)
604 Broadway Street,
Vallejo, California 94590
Phone: 707-558-0104; Fax: 707-558-8047

» Return to Driving Under the Influence program in California, directory of service providers

Note: This list is provided for convenience and informational purposes only. We do not recommend or endorse any specific Alcohol or Drug Risk Reduction Program.

The Interstate Driver’s License Compact

The Interstate Driver’s License Compact serves the purpose of allowing different state DMVs to communicate. Therefore, if a person is visiting California and is arrested for drunk driving, the home state of the driver will find out about the arrest. This may affect the driver’s insurance as well as driving record in his or her home state.

Being arrested for DUI / DWI in California can be stressful, especially if one is from out-of-state. While you may have feelings of distress or anger following your arrest, do not waste any time in locating a qualified California DUI / DWI attorney. Wasting time will likely result in a suspension of your driver’s license by the Department of Motor Vehicles, which in turn will provide that information to your state’s DMV. If you or someone you know has been charged with a drunk driving offense you may need to find that person who remains in custody, and you will need to locate a bail bondsman too.

It is not always simple locating a friend or loved one who is in custody without the right information. When attempting to locate someone it is helpful to have the individual’s full name and birthdate as well as a booking number related to the arrest.

The state of California may not suspend the home state license of a driver. The best the Department of Motor Vehicles can do is to suspend the driver’s driving privileges in California. A person with an out-of-state driver’s license can fight the California suspension at a DMV hearing. The best way to challenge the DMV is to hire a California criminal defense attorney with vast experience in DUI / DWI cases.

The Interstate Driver’s License Compact is signed by 45 states. These states have a reciprocal arrangement regarding information related to certain convictions such as diving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Each state that is party to the Compact may suspend, restrict, or revoke the state license belonging to the driver. The five states that do not belong to the Compact are Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

Some states like California have administrative systems that handle DUI / DWI cases through a DMV hearing or something similar. Other states do not have such systems. Rather, these states wait until a person has been convicted of a DUI / DWI in criminal court. Once the conviction is reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles by the courts, the DMV will consider administrative action against the license. If you are in any state, it is wise to consult with the best attorney available in that state.

Punishments between states vary. Some states will simply enforce the same punishment that was given in another state. Others will give lighter sentences, while some other states will simply ignore some convictions.

The best possible way for drivers with out-of-state licenses to keep their driving privileges after a California DUI / DWI arrest is to challenge the California Department of Motor Vehicles. A California criminal defense attorney with vast experience in DUI / DWI cases can provide information about the all states’ licensing policies and successfully challenge these administrative hearings.

Superior Court Of California, County of Kings

If you have been arrested for Driving Under the Influence of alcohol or drugs in the state of California, it is important to know the location of the courthouse where your arraignment will be held. If there are multiple courthouses in the county, please contact a skilled California DUI / DWI defense attorney for more information.

Kings County Superior Court
Hanford Courthouse
1426 South Drive, Hanford, CA 93230

Avenal Superior Court
Avenal Downtown Courthouse
501 E. Kings Street, Avenal, CA 93204

Corcoran Superior Court
Corcoran Downtown Courthouse
1000 Chittenden Avenue, Corcoran, CA 93212

Lemoore Superior Court
Lemoore Downtown Courthouse
449 C Street, Lemoore, CA 93245

» Kings County Superior Court of California website.

Getting arrested on suspicion of DUI / DWI can be a frightening experience. Suspected drunk drivers face a legal labyrinth that can seem daunting. A drunk driving case generates two separate cases – in criminal court, and at the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). A California attorney with experience defending drinking and driving cases can help drivers navigate through both the DMV hearing and the court case.

» Return to California Superior Courts, general information