Civil Penalties and Violation of a Protective Order
Individuals who violate protective orders in California domestic violence cases can face civil penalties as well as criminal court consequences. Domestic abuse cases can involve any type of intimate partners – straight and gay couples who are married, divorced, living together, have children together, or who have dated at any time. Protective orders issued by courts are designed to prohibit an offender from committing specific acts of abuse, re-entering his or her own home, or engaging in certain behaviors.
Any intimate partner who knowingly violates a protective order faces a misdemeanor charge punishable by a maximum of one year in jail and a $1,000 fine. California courts may even punish an offender for violating an order in California that was issued in another state. If the violation results in physical injury to the alleged victim, the offender will serve mandatory jail time of at least 30 days, possibly up to one year, and the fine may rise to $2,000.
In a civil court, an individual who is found “liable” for committing this “wrong” or “tort” is subject to several different heavy fines but cannot be sentenced to jail or prison. Other than terminology, the penalty is the primary difference between a civil suit and a criminal case.
That being said, there are several differences between the procedures involved in civil and criminal courts with respect to violating a protective order. In a criminal domestic abuse case, it is the prosecutor who actually files the charge, not the protected party (otherwise known as the victim), as many incorrectly believe. In a civil case, it is the protected party (who becomes known as the “plaintiff”) who sues the alleged abuser.
Another difference is that it is much easier to find the defendant liable in a civil suit, as the judge or jury must only believe that there is a “greater than 50 percent chance” that the defendant violated the court order that was issued to protect his or her intimate partner. In a criminal action, the judge or jury must find the defendant guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt” in order to convict.
In a civil lawsuit for violating a protective order, there are three types of monetary damages that may be awarded to the plaintiff. “General” damages are awarded to cover injuries for which an exact dollar amount cannot be calculated. “Pain and suffering” are the most common types of general damages. “Special” damages are awarded to cover the plaintiff’s out-of-pocket expenses. These may include any hospital bills, the cost to replace or repair damaged personal property, and reasonable attorney’s fees. “Punitive” damages are awarded over and above special and general damages to punish a losing party’s willful or malicious misconduct.
In addition to monetary damages, a person found liable for violating a protective order may also have a civil protective order issued against him or her. In general, a civil protective order will prohibit the restrained individual from coming within a certain number of yards from the protected party in order to prevent further abuse, threats or harassment. However, in a case where the defendant has been found guilty of violating an order already in effect, the order would likely be much more restrictive. Unless a specific end date is listed, the order will expire three years after being issued.
Clearly there are many consequences, both civil and criminal, that face a person accused of violating a protective order. Such being the case, it is imperative that an individual in this situation immediately contacts an attorney upon this type of accusation. The criminal defense lawyers at The Kavinoky Law Firm are experienced at handling every type of California intimate partner abuse case and have successfully defended countless individuals from the severe consequences that are associated with a conviction for violating a protective order. In addition, they can provide referrals for civil defense attorneys when necessary. Contact them today for a free consultation.
