Criminal threats is a California domestic violence offense that can be charged when an individual is accused of threatening an intimate partner with bodily harm. Intimate partners can be straight or gay couples who are married or divorced, living together, have children together, or who have dated at any time.
An individual who willfully threatens to commit a crime against his or her intimate partner which will result in death or serious bodily injury to that partner either by verbal, written or electronic communication, whether or not he or she has any intent to actually carry out the threat, may be charged with this crime if the partner is reasonably in fear for his or her own safety or for the safety of his or her family.
Criminal threats can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony, punishable by up to one year in the county jail or state prison. It is important to note that the threat, on its face and under the circumstances, must be so clear, unconditional, immediate and specific so as to convey to the partner that the threat could be immediately executed, even if the defendant doesn’t actually intend to carry out the threat.
In an intimate partner abuse case, there are several evidentiary issues that frequently arise. The attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm have experience dealing with every aspect of a California domestic abuse case and receive ongoing training to make sure that they maintain their reputation for excellence. They not only know the intricacies behind each and every evidentiary issue that may arise in a criminal threats trial, but they know how to successfully use each to their client’s advantage.
The following are some of the issues that are likely to arise in a trial where the defendant is charged with making criminal threats:
- Battered Person’s Syndrome (more commonly called Battered Women’s Syndrome) is a psychological condition that is used to describe someone who has been consistently and/or severely victimized by his or her partner. Although it usually refers to a woman, battered person’s syndrome can apply to a woman or a man involved in a heterosexual or homosexual relationship
- Physical evidence can be a huge issue in a threat case. Photographs or medical records revealing an injury or letters or recordings evidencing the threat are helpful to the prosecution if and when they exist. A skilled defense attorney knows the appropriate arguments to make to try to exclude such evidence
- DNA evidence is playing a larger role than ever before in intimate partner violence cases throughout the country, both to convict the guilty and to exonerate those wrongly accused or convicted
- Recanting victims are very common in domestic abuse cases. There are a number of reasons that a victim “recants” (takes back his or her story) during a trial. Because this is so common, the prosecution usually expects that the intimate partner will recant and knows exactly how to proceed under this type of situation
- Eyewitness accounts can make or break a case. Either side can subpoena witnesses who were present during the charged incident. A skilled criminal defense lawyer will work with defense witnesses to make sure that they tell their version of the events in the light most favorable to the defendant. A good attorney also knows how to effectively cross-examine prosecution witnesses to highlight discrepancies in their accounts
The prosecution frequently tries to introduce hearsay and 911 calls into the record. Unlike most criminal cases, hearsay and 911 calls are sometimes allowed into evidence in domestic violence cases. This is another reason why it is so important to have an attorney who is experienced in California domestic abuse law, as he or she knows how to effectively argue against their admission.
Domestic violence law is technical and complex, which is why it is critical to hire an attorney who is qualified, skilled and experienced in this area. Contact the unparalleled attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm for a free consultation.
The American Trial Lawyers Association has named him one of the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers in California” each year since 2007. Los Angeles magazine has identified Darren as a “SuperLawyer” every year since 2010. Darren received an “AV Preeminent Rating” by Martindale-Hubbell (a peer review ranking that signals the highest level of professional excellence and ethics); a perfect 10.0 Rating by Avvo.com (an independent attorney ranking site), and many other accolades.