Eyewitness Accounts and Infliction of Injury
Infliction of injury, more commonly called “spousal abuse,” is a California domestic violence crime that applies to intimate partners. These partners may be heterosexual or homosexual and married or divorced, living together or formerly living together, or have children in common. If an individual willfully inflicts any injury, no matter how minor, upon the body of an intimate partner, he or she can be charged with a felony, punishable by up to four years in prison and a fine of up to $6,000. This charge can be brought against a defendant even if he or she barely touched the intimate partner.
Because of the intimate nature of domestic abuse, most violent situations occur outside the presence of witnesses. As a result, many infliction of injury cases are based on “he said, she said” allegations. Eyewitnesses, therefore, play a vital role in helping to prove or disprove an alleged victim’s charge of abuse.
The job of an eyewitness is to simply tell the judge and/or jury what he or she saw with no inherent bias. Easily said, rarely done. Eyewitnesses almost always have a bias either for or against one of the parties, depending on his or her relationship with them. As a result, the truth generally gets lost in translation.
There is a common misconception that a witness testifies for either the prosecution or the defense, but that is truly not the case. Since both parties have a chance to examine the witness, witnesses essentially testify for both parties. A skilled criminal defense lawyer knows how to take an eyewitness who is presented by the prosecution and turn him or her into a witness who ultimately helps prove the defendant’s version of the events. Similarly, a good defense attorney will invest time in preparing an eyewitness that he or she intends to “put on the stand” in order to try to make sure that he or she is comfortable with answering questions and to ensure that the witness doesn’t get tripped up by the prosecutor’s cross-examination.
Infliction of injury cases are usually based on a highly charged, emotional incident that unfortunately took a turn for the worse. This means that even if there was an eyewitness to the abuse, that individual may not have witnessed all the events that led to the charged incident and may not have the accurate back-story on what took place before the charged incident. It is the attorney’s job to make sure that this type of information gets relayed to the jury. The experienced attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm have successfully defended countless individuals who faced infliction of injury charges. They are familiar with all aspects of California’s intimate partner abuse laws and know how to skillfully examine witnesses in ways that are beneficial to their clients. In conjunction with their private investigators, the attorneys not only interview all witnesses but also check the criminal history of each witness to uncover any past conduct that could be considered relevant in weighing that witness’s credibility. A knowledgeable attorney will effectively cross-examine witnesses in an infliction of injury case to bring out and highlight discrepancies in their accounts that may otherwise be overlooked.
An eyewitness could potentially be the “kiss of death” to a defendant facing a domestic abuse charge. When facing an infliction of injury charge (especially when there was an eyewitness), it becomes even more critical for the accused to hire an attorney who is competent and experienced in handling witness preparation and who excels in cross-examination. The attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm know how to handle diverse witnesses under a variety of circumstances. Keeping the jury in mind, they know when it is appropriate to examine a witness with care and compassion and they know when it is appropriate to “take the gloves off” to aggressively attack. They are in it to win! Don’t hesitate to contact them today. Click here for a free consultation and for the best representation.
The American Trial Lawyers Association has named him one of the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers in California” each year since 2007. Los Angeles magazine has identified Darren as a “SuperLawyer” every year since 2010. Darren received an “AV Preeminent Rating” by Martindale-Hubbell (a peer review ranking that signals the highest level of professional excellence and ethics); a perfect 10.0 Rating by Avvo.com (an independent attorney ranking site), and many other accolades.