Hearsay and its admissibility in a stalking case prosecuted as a California crime of domestic violence
When an individual harasses or follows and threatens his or her intimate partner, with the intent of placing that partner in fear, he or she may be charged with the California domestic violence crime of stalking. Intimate partners may be heterosexual partners or same sex partners that are married or divorced, living together or formerly living together, dating or formerly dating or that have children together. If convicted, the defendant faces either a misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail and up to a $1,000 fine or a felony, punishable by up to five years in state prison. Aggravating factors and/or prior convictions help determine whether the defendant will be charged with a misdemeanor or a felony and also help determine the extent of the punishment.
There are certain rules of evidence that apply to California domestic abuse cases that don’t apply to other types of criminal cases. Because the stakes are so high in a D.V. case – one’s reputation, family and career are all placed in jeopardy the minute an arrest is made – it is critical for an individual accused of an intimate partner abuse crime to immediately hire an attorney who specializes in this technical area of the law and who is therefore familiar with all of the special evidentiary exceptions that come into play in a domestic violence case.
“Hearsay” is one of those exceptions. Hearsay is a legal term and simply refers to any statement that an individual made previous to his or her testimony under oath, in court. One’s statement or statements that he or she made out of court are oftentimes thought to be relevant to a case, and attorneys frequently try to admit those statements into evidence in a criminal trial. Under most circumstances, these statements are excluded from evidence, because they are believed to be unreliable. However, in California, hearsay, under certain circumstances, is admissible in a domestic violence case. The most common type of hearsay that is acceptable in a DV case is a statement or statements that the alleged victim made when he or she was either witnessing or experiencing the alleged incident. These statements may have been recorded in a 911-telephone call, heard by a neighbor or friend or made to the investigating officer. This type of hearsay is admissible in a stalking or other intimate partner abuse trial because it is believed that the spontaneity of such statements provides an adequate guarantee of their reliability. In reality, this clearly isn’t the case, as many domestic abuse cases are inappropriately filed based on false charges, when the accuser deliberately placed a 911 call out of jealousy, revenge or anger. However, because the statements will still be admissible, it is up to a savvy criminal defense lawyer to recognize when such is the case and to bring it to the judge and jury’s attention, thus serving to vindicate his or her client.
Because of the highly complex and technical rules (and exceptions to those rules) that apply to a California intimate partner violence case, it is absolutely necessary to have a skilled and qualified California defense lawyer who knows how to exclude or downplay this type of evidence. The exceptional attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm have both the knowledge and experience to aggressively tackle any issue that may arise in a stalking case. They specialize in DV cases and have successfully defended countless individuals charged with these types of crimes. When things are at their worst, the attorneys from the Kavinoky Law Firm are at their best! Contact them today for a free consultation and for the best representation.
