Recanting Victims and the Violation of a Protective Order
Recanting victims aren’t uncommon in cases of violation of a protective order and other California domestic violence offenses that apply to intimate partners. The term “intimate partners” applies to every type of couple – they may be straight or gay and can be married, divorced, living together, have children in common, or be dating currently or have dated in the past.
Protective orders are issued by courts in California domestic abuse cases to prohibit an offender from engaging in specific acts of abuse, re-entering his or her own home or even behaving in a specified way. A violation of protective order charge is a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of one year in jail and a $1,000 fine. If the violation results in physical injury to the alleged victim, the offender will serve mandatory jail time of at least 30 days and the fine may rise to $2,000. California courts may even punish an offender for violating an order in California that was issued in another state.
A violation of a protective order charge can be filed against an individual even if the prosecution has no physical evidence, which means it would be easy for an alleged “victim” (the protected party) to charge his or her partner with this crime with little or no evidence. Many times an individual will do this out of revenge, anger, or another motive and may later decide to tell the truth. However, once the police are involved, it is too late to take the allegation back, as only the prosecutor and/or judge can decide to drop the charges. When these are the facts, it is imperative for the accused to hire a skilled criminal defense lawyer from The Kavinoky Law Firm.
If the protected party chooses of his or her own free will that calling the police was a mistake for any reason, it is best for both partners to speak with an attorney to devise a strategy. Many times the accuser thinks that “recanting” (which means to take back or deny) the original story or not cooperating with the police or prosecution will help the defendant. Unfortunately, that is incorrect. In fact, in an intimate partner abuse case, the prosecution expects an alleged victim to recant and knows how to proceed under these circumstances. A genuine recanting victim can be extremely harmful to the defendant if not first guided by an attorney.
When the protected party recants, two major issues arise. The first is that evidence that may otherwise have been inadmissible during the trial will be admissible, and the second issue is that a “recanting victim” gives the prosecution a great argument against the defendant. Beginning with the first issue, when the protected party recants his or her story, the prosecution plays for the jury a recording of the call that he or she placed to the police. The prosecutor will also admit into evidence any statements that the protected party made to the police during the initial investigation. Because these statements were made in the heat of the moment and possibly out of revenge or another motive, these statements can be devastating to the defense. Looking at the second issue, when the protected party recants, the prosecutor usually brings in an expert witness who testifies that the individual is recanting because he or she has either been threatened by the accused into doing so or that he or she is afraid of what further abuse might take place if he or she doesn’t recant. The expert will further explain that recanting is part of the domestic abuse “cycle of abuse” and that the protected party likely suffers from “battered person’s syndrome”.
When an intimate partner chooses to recant his or her allegation, a highly qualified defense attorney from The Kavinoky Law Firm can help both parties navigate through the system with knowledge and compassion. A skilled defense lawyer can outline an effective defense strategy during a free consultation.
